- What is the difference between list [1] and list [1:] in Python?
By using a : colon in the list index, you are asking for a slice, which is always another list In Python you can assign values to both an individual item in a list, and to a slice of the list
- Meaning of list[-1] in Python - Stack Overflow
I have a piece of code here that is supposed to return the least common element in a list of elements, ordered by commonality: def getSingle(arr): from collections import Counter c = Counte
- Python: list of lists - Stack Overflow
The first, [:], is creating a slice (normally often used for getting just part of a list), which happens to contain the entire list, and thus is effectively a copy of the list The second, list(), is using the actual list type constructor to create a new list which has contents equal to the first list
- What is the difference between list and list [:] in python?
When reading, list is a reference to the original list, and list[:] shallow-copies the list When assigning, list (re)binds the name and list[:] slice-assigns, replacing what was previously in the list Also, don't use list as a name since it shadows the built-in
- Make a list - Computer - Google Keep Help
Reorder list items On your computer, go to Google Keep Choose a list Point to the item you want to move At the left, click and hold Move Drag the item where you want
- slice - How slicing in Python works - Stack Overflow
The first way works for a list or a string; the second way only works for a list, because slice assignment isn't allowed for strings Other than that I think the only difference is speed: it looks like it's a little faster the first way Try it yourself with timeit timeit () or preferably timeit repeat ()
- python - Access item in a list of lists - Stack Overflow
You can access the elements in a list-of-lists by first specifying which list you're interested in and then specifying which element of that list you want For example, 17 is element 2 in list 0, which is list1[0][2]:
- java - Create a List of primitive int? - Stack Overflow
List<Integer> might lead to devastating memory fragmentation Java maintains constant pool for some integers in 0 128 range but generally Java allocates a new object for each 32-bit integer (wasting at least 16-4=12 bytes of RAM) + worsening GC performance
|