- super () in Java - Stack Overflow
super() is a special use of the super keyword where you call a parameterless parent constructor In general, the super keyword can be used to call overridden methods, access hidden fields or invoke a superclass's constructor
- Understanding Python super() with __init__() methods
super() lets you avoid referring to the base class explicitly, which can be nice But the main advantage comes with multiple inheritance, where all sorts of fun stuff can happen
- How does Pythons super () work with multiple inheritance?
In fact, multiple inheritance is the only case where super() is of any use I would not recommend using it with classes using linear inheritance, where it's just useless overhead
- java - When do I use super ()? - Stack Overflow
I'm currently learning about class inheritance in my Java course and I don't understand when to use the super() call? Edit: I found this example of code where super variable is used: class A {
- AttributeError: super object has no attribute - Stack Overflow
Thirdly, when you call super() you do not need to specify what the super is, as that is inherent in the class definition for Child Below is a fixed version of your code which should perform as you expect
- coding style - Using super in C++ - Stack Overflow
As for chaining super::super, as I mentionned in the question, I have still to find an interesting use to that For now, I only see it as a hack, but it was worth mentioning, if only for the differences with Java (where you can't chain "super")
- correct way to use super (argument passing) - Stack Overflow
So I was following Python's Super Considered Harmful, and went to test out his examples However, Example 1-3, which is supposed to show the correct way of calling super when handling __init__ met
- super() and @staticmethod interaction - Stack Overflow
Things to Know About Python Super [2 of 3] (this one specifically covers unbound super) Things to Know About Python Super [3 of 3] Also, he argues strongly for removing unbound super from Python 3 here I said you were calling it "incorrectly" (though correctness is largely meaningless without context, and a toy example doesn't give much context)
|